> AI, implemented.

Take your AI initiatives from stuck to shipped.

runpoint//pipeline

// Explain the problem

▸ Stop tinkering. Put your projects on track.

Your CEO has read the articles. Seen the demos. Set expectations.

Now your team is stuck: Smart people running pilots that never ship fast enough to justify the investment or make good on the promise.

Six-month timelines. Steering committee approvals. Security training before you write a line of code. By the time you ship, GPT-6 is out and does it out of the box.

Why AI initiatives stall

Traditional agencies: Strategy decks and roadmaps. Then they hand you back the problem.

AI consultants: They'll build you a prototype. Then disappear before it touches production.

The result: Rudderless experiments. Siloed efforts. No follow-through. Your initiative stays stuck while competitors ship.

Death by committee

  • Design by consensus
  • Six-month specs
  • Weekly meetings to discuss features
ERROR: Timeout
Project: Q3_2024_ChatBot
Status: Pending approval (184d)

Wrong builders

  • Teams without operator instinct building for problems they don't understand
ERROR: Deprecated
Project: Document_Analyzer
Status: Superseded by GPT-5

Red tape gridlock

  • Month-long MSA reviews
  • Security clearance delays
  • Can't access Anthropic
  • No GitHub fork access
ERROR: Resource unavailable
Project: Sales_Assistant
Status: Blocked (GitHub access)

// Show the solution

▸ How do we do it?

▸ 1. Think like a VC, not like IT

MIT says 95% of AI projects fail. Good. That's supposed to happen.

Bezos's hit rate at Amazon? About 10%. His secret? Enough at-bats that the 10% covered the 90%.

You need to structure your AI initiatives like a venture portfolio: Quick wins (proven ROI in weeks), moonshots (10x potential), and infrastructure (makes everything else possible). Spread risk. Accept failures. Move fast.

FAILURE RATE: 90% expected
HIT RATE: 10% pays for everything
REQUIREMENT: Max at-bats possible

▸ 2. The Operator Engineer archetype

You don't need a dev team. You need the right individual.

The Operator Engineer is a new archetype: Someone with business instincts who's run things, knows what problems actually matter, and has obsessive curiosity about AI. Technical ability? That's actually the least important skill. We can teach Claude Code in a month. We can't teach operator instinct.

BUSINESS SENSE

Knows which problems actually move the needle

+

TECHNICAL CHOPS

Can vibe code their way through prototypes

+

OBSESSIVE CURIOSITY

Building on weekends because they want to

▸ 3. The forward-deployed model

Execs set the priorities. We handle everything downstream: features, tech stack, workflows, user testing. We're aligned to your do-ers, not your PowerPoint schedule.

Speed matters: We ship prototypes in days, production systems in weeks. Monthly retainers, continuous iteration, measurable business impact.

Read more about the forward-deployed model →

// Give examples

▸ What does "AI Implementation" actually mean?

Not all "AI" is the same. The term covers everything from simple automation to autonomous agents.

Understanding where your work falls on this spectrum helps you choose the right tools, set realistic expectations, and avoid the common trap of applying agent-level thinking to automation-level problems.

The key distinction: Deterministic vs. Probabilistic.

If your processes are pre-defined with fixed rules, you're in deterministic territory—same input, same output, every time.

If AI has discretion to adapt its approach based on context, you're in probabilistic territory—same goal, different paths to get there.

◄ Deterministic Probabilistic ►
LEVEL 0

Workflow Automation

"You design it, tools execute it"

AI coding assistants and automation platforms help you build traditional software and workflows faster. Workflows are trigger-based and execution is completely predictable. You're the architect—AI just speeds up the building.

Zapier: Form submit → CRM → Slack
Claude Code builds your dashboard
LEVEL 1

AI-Enabled Workflow

"AI contributes, you orchestrate"

AI generates content or makes decisions at specific steps in your workflow. The structure is still rigid and pre-defined, but AI adds intelligence where you specify. Inputs and outputs are predictable even if the exact content varies.

Email → AI researches company → Draft intro
Ticket → AI analyzes → Routes to team
LEVEL 2

Agent

"Agent decides how to accomplish your goal"

You give the agent a goal, tools, instructions, and knowledge. It determines the best approach, adapts to unexpected inputs, and handles diverse scenarios without predefined paths. It has discretion over how to use its tools and when to ask for help.

"Research 20 companies" → Agent decides strategy
"Monitor competitors" → Agent defines significance
1. Input
2. Process
3. Output
Fixed sequence, predictable execution
Input
🤖 AI
Output
AI generates content at a specific step
🤖
Agent
Tools
Knowledge
Goal
Instructions
Agent decides how to use its resources
→ Explore the full spectrum with examples → Check out examples of all 3

// Demonstrate credibility

▸ Why trust us?

It's a reasonable question. Everyone and their cousin is shilling AI. But that's because it is a gold rush.

It's new. It's transformative. It can be a little confusing.

So let's start with what we're not, and what we are.

What we're not

Futurists or Gurus We're not designing your 2035 business. We're solving 2025 problems.
PPT-obsessed consultants If we're not building for >24 hours, we get antsy.
Dev Shop Hucksters We're not selling you a team of junior devs offshore.

What we are

Dangerously obsessed We build on nights and weekends. New model drops? We're testing it.
True believers Everyone here had their "holy shit" moment with AI. We're cynical about hype.
"Seasoned" professionals Middle-aged is a feature. We've had P&L responsibility. We've worked at scale.
In past lives, we've worked with brands both big and small, including:

// Tell them how to engage

▸ Three ways to work with us

⚙︎

Portfolio strategy

Structure the chaos before you build

  • Week-long engagement: audit, framework, POCs
  • Portfolio prioritization (moonshots, quick wins, infrastructure)
  • Red tape removal strategy + executive presentation

Investment: $5,000 (credited toward retainer)

Outcome: Clear roadmap and organizational buy-in

→ Schedule strategy kickoff
⚙︎

Operator training

Enable your internal AI builders

  • Operator engineer identification & training
  • Tool mastery (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.)
  • Red tape removal strategy & ongoing mentorship

Investment: Add-on to strategy or retainer

Outcome: Self-sufficient team shipping independently

→ Explore training
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

"These guys are operators who code. They understand business context in a way no tech team does. They think like founders, build like engineers, and ship like they've got equity." — Evan, Partner at JSTAR

// The Takeaway

▸ Ship something imperfect that solves a real problem

The framework is simple:

Build something that works for one person, solves one real problem, and maps to your company's top priorities. Don't be precious. Don't worry about scale. Don't add features because you might need them later.

Ship it ugly. Learn fast. Iterate or kill it.

START → Real problem? → Maps to priorities? → Works for 1 person? → SHIP
           ↓ NO                ↓ NO                 ↓ NO
         KILL               KILL                 ITERATE

> Ready to escape pilot purgatory?_

Start with the 5-minute playbook. Or skip ahead and schedule a call.